Forum Moderators: open
We routinely differentiate between two kinds of military action: the inevitable carnage and collateral damage of diffuse hostilities, and the precision of a “surgical strike,” methodically targeted to the sources of our particular peril. The latter, when executed well, minimizes resources and unintended consequences alike.
As we battle the coronavirus pandemic, and heads of state declare that we are “at war” with this contagion, the same dichotomy applies. This can be open war, with all the fallout that portends, or it could be something more surgical. The United States and much of the world so far have gone in for the former. I write now with a sense of urgency to make sure we consider the surgical approach, while there is still time.
One trend, just starting, I see, especially in the US, is the equating of mask wearing with the relaxing of distancing. If this acquires widespread acceptance hotspots may begin to pop up all over the place.
The US has been buying out from under other countries
I’ve long suspected that Covid-19 deaths have/are being undercounted for the simple reasons of few test kits available so only testing at hospitals and only then when symptoms show.
At what point does this become morbid?
At what point does this become morbid?