Forum Moderators: open
We routinely differentiate between two kinds of military action: the inevitable carnage and collateral damage of diffuse hostilities, and the precision of a “surgical strike,” methodically targeted to the sources of our particular peril. The latter, when executed well, minimizes resources and unintended consequences alike.
As we battle the coronavirus pandemic, and heads of state declare that we are “at war” with this contagion, the same dichotomy applies. This can be open war, with all the fallout that portends, or it could be something more surgical. The United States and much of the world so far have gone in for the former. I write now with a sense of urgency to make sure we consider the surgical approach, while there is still time.
What’s the discrepancy?
It is on me to protect myself and family, not a third party who may really not have my best interests at heart.
It's a flu.
I continue to be very uneasy about Turkey.
likely coverup mode providing unreliable dataThat sounds plausible. At least it’s preferable to Explanation B, which is that they really and truly have a doubling time of 20 hours or whatever it is. (Or explanation C, that it’s been there all along but they are excruciatingly slow about testing.)
it may be rather morbid but it is also quite intoxicatingYes, there is that nasty feeling of slowing to stare at a messy accident. *
I’d really like to wrong.A few days ago I was watching as France and Iran politely jostled for 6th place (confirmed cases, not deaths): “After you, sir” “No, please, after you” toggling back and forth for a day or two. It looks as if Iran has won for the time being--i.e. France’s numbers are higher. But will it stay that way?
In bold writing at the end of the video, “We underestimated this. You don’t have to do the same,” appears as a final warning.
Italian Premier Giuseppe Conte put his entire country on lockdown on March 9 to combat the spread of the coronavirus, banning all but the most important travel and putting the final kibosh on social gatherings after Italians failed to take previous warnings to heart amid skyrocketing new infections.
Conte took to task young people who continued to gather socially as the virus spread, saying “this night life... we can't allow this any more.”
[fox10phoenix.com...]
"In a video created by Milanese filmmaking collective A Thing By, several newly terrified residents of Italian cities chide themselves for their earlier skepticism and underestimation. “It’s just a flu,” one says. “This isn’t all bull---t like you thought,” confirms another. It’s disturbing to hear them describe what it’s like watching videos of Americans living their lives now as carefree as the Italians were 10 days ago,"
[fastcompany.com...]
Despite demands from Rome to stay at home as much as possible and limit all travel to essential trips, several people have been fined and reported for breaking lockdown rules. Giovanni Di Perri from the Ospedale Amedeo di Savoia of Turin, northern Italy, warned ignoring the ban could result in "thousands of deaths" across the peninsula as he spoke to Express.co.uk earlier this week.
He added: "I have to tell the truth, I still see people around shaking hands, meeting, laughing - they didn't understand that nobody should be out in the streets.
[express.co.uk...]
Events are forbidden, but meetings for legal purposes (like parliament), necessary business meetings ...From this I deduce that businesses in the Netherlands operate on a very different mindset from businesses in the US. I don’t believe any American business manager would be capable of saying “This meeting is not necessary”.