Forum Moderators: phranque

Message Too Old, No Replies

E.U. Claims Search Engines Violate E.U. Rules On Data Retention

         

engine

5:57 pm on May 26, 2010 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



E.U. Claims Search Engines Violate E.U. Rules On Data Retention [nytimes.com]
A European Union data protection panel on Wednesday criticized Google, Microsoft and Yahoo for operating search engines that it said kept data on individual computer users for too long, in violation of E.U. rules.

The group of 27 E.U. national privacy chiefs, called the Article 29 Working Party, said it would also ask the U.S. Federal Trade Commission to investigate whether the data retention practices of the three search engines violated U.S. law.

In a letter sent Wednesday to the three search engines, the advisory panel to the European Commission asked the companies to appoint outside auditors to verify that their practices of rendering individual data anonymous truly eliminated all links to individuals.

jecasc

8:14 pm on May 26, 2010 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I have been asking myself for a long time why many US based companies join "Safe Harbor" [en.wikipedia.org] and then act surprised when someone actually comes along and asks them to abide to EU data protetion rules.

The statement of Google is ridiculous and outrageous in my opinon:

Google was the first search engine to reduce the time it stores search logs,” and the first to make them anonymous, Mr. Verney said. “We develop our policies based on what provides the best experience for users both in terms of respect for their privacy and the quality and security of our services. Our current retention policy represents the most responsible balance between these two important concerns.”


What garbage is that. You have to abide to the law. If the law says you can't store personal data longer than x month it is no excuse to say: But hey, we only store for x month +10, and that is great because our competitors store for x month + 15. No that's not great, because regulations say it's x month and not x month +1 or x month +10 or +15.

That's like saying: Hey I have robbed a bank yesterday and got away with 10,000,000$ and killed four people in the process. But that's good because our competitors robbed 15,000,000$ and killed 10 people.