Forum Moderators: martinibuster
Their priority is "does this category list a good selection of sites that answer the question?", and *not* "does this category list every site on this topic?".
Once you understand that, you'll see why many sites are not included. If you see such an omission, there is nothing to stop you suggesting a site, whether or not you have any involvement with it at all.
Their priority is "does this category list a good selection of sites that answer the question?", and *not* "does this category list every site on this topic?".
So if this is the thinking here, the search engine section should just list Google and Yahoo, since together they cover just about everything.
Is this the case?
That is, the directory grows by editors listing the stuff that looks like it is the stuff that people will want to read, not by people suggesting that their own sites get listed.
For the other guys who also sell red widgets, I guess they're screwed unless if they can create a site that has cooler red widgets than the ones already in the directory.
I'm always late for everything :¦