Forum Moderators: martinibuster
[edited by: not2easy at 11:51 am (utc) on Apr 6, 2025]
[edit reason] ToS: OT [/edit]
[edited by: not2easy at 11:48 am (utc) on Apr 6, 2025]
[edit reason] ToS: OT [/edit]
I think it's obvious at this point what Google has done. When they made the switch from a primary CPC model, to a primary CPM model, they knew it would tank the earnings of almost all publishers. So, they applied artificial caps to the rate at which the earnings of existing publishers could fall, at the time the switch was made, which they gradually reduced down to reality over the course of a year, so as to not shock publishers right out of the gate. In other words, I don't believe these significant drops are due solely to changing market conditions. Whatever programmatic safeguards they had in place to prevent system shock are now gone. That's the change. And it was done to make advertising more cost beneficial for advertisers, in a time in which AI is disrupting the entire industry. The only way to do that was to increase their ad inventory, while making impressions cheaper. That's it. That's the whole story.
[edited by: not2easy at 12:27 pm (utc) on Apr 6, 2025]
[edit reason] ToS: OT [/edit]
this is caused by Google futzing with the system.
[edited by: not2easy at 12:28 pm (utc) on Apr 6, 2025]
[edit reason] ToS: OT [/edit]
[edited by: not2easy at 2:52 am (utc) on Apr 7, 2025]
[edit reason] ToS: OT [/edit]