'AdSense for Search' vs 'AdSense for Conent' --which one works better

Forum Moderators: martinibuster

Message Too Old, No Replies

'AdSense for Search' vs 'AdSense for Conent' --which one works better

thecuban1

3:47 am on Apr 20, 2010 (gmt 0)

out of the two which one would you say gives you the best $ results

I just installed Adsense for Search on my site <snip> but would like to know from more experienced members what their experience with it is like compared to the normal Adsense for Content.

Thanks

[edited by: bill at 4:08 am (utc) on Apr 20, 2010]
[edit reason] No links to your sites. See TOS. [/edit]

rocco

5:44 pm on Apr 20, 2010 (gmt 0)

My experience: way more clicks with AFS but less revenue per click. So you have to try out.

BigDave

7:40 pm on Apr 20, 2010 (gmt 0)

I get a higher CTR and eCPM with search, but nowhere near the number of queries compared to the number of impressions I get with content. Content is more total income.

netmeg

8:38 pm on Apr 20, 2010 (gmt 0)

It depends.

(Meaning, there's no real way to answer this question because there are far too many variables)

explorador

9:04 pm on Apr 21, 2010 (gmt 0)

well in MY case, some sites using Adsense: Adsense for content wins. That's only my case.