Forum Moderators: martinibuster
Imagine my surprise when I opened a letter from Google today that states, in part
[An invitation to try AdWords to drive visitors to your website]...
The emphasis comes from the original. They even gave me a coupon for a $100 credit.
Does the left hand know what the right is doing?
<edit>Fixed bad speeling,/edit>
[edited by: willybfriendly at 1:37 am (utc) on Nov. 17, 2009]
[edited by: martinibuster at 3:37 am (utc) on Nov. 17, 2009]
[edit reason] Removed Email Quote. See TOS. [/edit]
Google is getting worse than the phone company. Of course they know I already use adwords since they have forced me to use the same email for both adsense and adwords! So not only do they waste several $ sending this cr*p out, they also scare and annoy the heck out of me.
It is like getting a letter from the IRS. There can be no good news in there.
There was another post recently about someone buying cheap advertising space on a highly-visited site in order to get traffic.
Apart from search engines, what are valid ways to get visitors and what aren't? Just because you promote your site some way, does this necessarily make you guilty of arbitrage if you are an Adsense publisher?
I don't promote my sites but I'm just interested to know.
Apart from search engines, what are valid ways to get visitors and what aren't? Just because you promote your site some way, does this necessarily make you guilty of arbitrage if you are an Adsense publisher?
Good questions. I am not sure anyone, including Google, has a definitive answer. First there were the AdSense "bad business model match" emails and the accompanying closure of accounts. Then there were the still largely unexplained termination of AdWords accounts.
Of course, the last 2-3 years have brought very little clarity about doing business with Google.
Odd situation we find ourselves in, isn't it?
This was a printed, hard copy letter deliverd by snail mail (which, as I read it, is not explicitly prohibited by the TOS). It was addressed to me as an AdSense user and in bolded typography invited me to use AdWords to drive traffic to my website. the letter filled a full page and had an attached coupon with promotion code to redeem for AdWords credit.
Not trying to push limits here, but without the context of the letter it is hard to discuss the ramifications.
But yeah, this goes to show that Google is just the average clueless corporate. Some folks in the company may be smart, but other parts, including their marketing, are just entirely clueless. In my opinion.
It was addressed to me as an AdSense user and in bolded typography invited me to use AdWords to drive traffic to my website
a) You are absolutely certain this originated from AdWords?
b) You are absolutely certain this was sent to you in your capacity as an AdSense Publisher?
I'm not doubting what you say but, I don't immediately buy the left hand/right hand theory.
Sure it's not SPAM / SCAM?
The marketing does not know what the operation guys are doing..the adsense guys don't know what they are doing on adwords side..The spam team does not know what is happening anywhere..and the guys doing site reviews seem to have very narrow guideleines with total discretion to destroy any biz..
And this is why sooner or later Google's business model will collapse. It's only a matter of years.
But before I do that, please take a moment to consider what the CTR is on the ads that go north. It can go as high as 10-50%. What that means is that after you battle your way to the number one position you may have to deal with a PPC ad up north hoovering a significant portion of traffic that otherwise may have swung your way. As Karl Malden used to say in those old commercials for Amex: "What do you do? What can you do?" Whip out the Amex?
It's a common complaint that if only they had more exposure people would tell their friends, webmasters would link to their site and they'd become more popular. If your site is good then put your money where your mouth is and drive traffic to it via a well planned PPC campaign.
Here's an example of what you can do to increase links to and awareness of your site: Do a PPC campaign for ["your niche" + Blogs] and drive it to a page on your site that features the top bloggers in your niche. Bloggers love to link to quality sites. Let bloggers know you are there via PPC.
[edited by: martinibuster at 7:56 am (utc) on Nov. 17, 2009]
The marketing does not know what the operation guys are doing..the adsense guys don't know what they are doing on adwords side..The spam team does not know what is happening anywhere..and the guys doing site reviews seem to have very narrow guideleines with total discretion to destroy any biz..
Well said... and unfortunately very scary...
Yeah - Google's Policy Team... not connected to ordinary people. That reminds me onto special police or army forces in some areas of our world... Oh my...
That's why god inventented htaccess. ;) Eric Ward calls it Link Reclamation. He's been talking about that [seroundtable.com] for awhile.
See my post
Read it already. I agree 100%.
It is just that the latest AdWords account "killing" exercise is initiating many of ironic comments.
Now all that supplemented by this invitation... holly shmolly. Many AdSense folks dread of AdWords... because when QS kicked in initially, I believe it made a massacre among some.
Yeah, ASK has never gotten stopped... Buy example at example.com
Running to secure example.com!
Taken...
I would hope the head of AdSense would be aware of a possible violation of the rules by doing this.
I'm not touching it until I get word from someone that it's OK to send traffic to my site with AdWords, even though AdSense ads might appear on the landing page with other content.
I used AdWords for a couple of years to drive traffic to my main event site, and never had a bit of problem about it. My QS was 7 to 10 across 1000 keywords, and I usually paid around 3 cents a click. Only reason I don't use it for that site now is that I don't really need to; it ranks in the top five for pretty much every city in the state.
I on and off use AdWords to promote other sites, some with AdSense and some without, and I'm not particularly worried about it because it's very obvious that these sites are 90% content and 10% (or less) ads.
Yeah.. I know about the content vs ad argument. But the line is thin.. the risks great. What worked a couple of months back will not necessarily work anymore.
I'm flummoxed that people can't see the difference between driving PPC traffic to promote a site with a lot of good unique content and some ads, and a site with a lot of ads and a little bit of (unique or not so unique) content.
Most of AdSense folks build sites for AdSense. And many have evolved into webmasters that have great sites, but still there for AdSense only.
Unless you're NYT, WP, About or similar... and even sites like About have come up with "make money" in mind, then they figured they would need content, just so they can serve those "white teeth" annoying ads that look nothing but spammy, because I see them on "very bad" sites, too.
The line is thin - as per Green_Grass.
The AdSense team wants nothing more than for you to grow your business by growing your site's audience. AdWords is one of many ways to promote your site. Plenty of online and offline businesses have benefited from advertising on Google.com and Google's content network.
The challenge is when you use both products in a way that creates a bad user experience by ignoring the spirit of the AdWords Landing Page Quality guidelines. In other words, if you use advertising to promote your site, you need to be honest in the ad about what your site provides.
We don't have a problem with publishers advertising the benefits of their sites. We have a problem with publishers misrepresenting their sites in their ads or creating a deceptive business model that hurts the user experience.
If you're unsure whether what you're doing is deceptive, don't do it. That's always the best advice when it comes to policy questions. :)
ASA
PS: You can find the AdWords Landing Page and Site Quality Guidelines here [adwords.google.com] and the Google Webmaster guidelines here [google.com].