Forum Moderators: webwork

Message Too Old, No Replies

EU Copyright Directive

         

QuaterPan

6:29 am on May 31, 2018 (gmt 0)



Mentioned by BoredMeteor in this topic - [webmasterworld.com...] I thought that this subject deserved its own discussion.

Here are some resources:
[saveyourinternet.eu...] ( posted by BoredMeteor )
[eff.org...]
[limegreenipnews.com...]

Basically, the main issues, with this directive, due to be voted by the end of the month, is around the mandatory automatic filtering of content uploaded by users to detect copyright infringements and block them, and a link tax where web publishers would require to pay a mandatory fee, for having the right to link to a news article, even if the news site wants to make it free. (this is what was done in Spain, if I don't make mistake).

Now, people shouldn't take it too excessively, these rules, if voted, will apply only to be big sites, like Youtube, Facebook, Google News, etc... small web publishers will not be asked to invest in system to automatically check for content uploaded to their site, and will still continue to have the right to add links to news sites. The directive targets UGC platforms and news aggregators.

The goal of this directive is to protect content creators from Internet Giants who are making money from their content.

Now, of-course, there will be plenty of side effects. Like for example, a site may no longer be able to syndicate its content for free , if it's mandatory for news aggregators to pay a fee.

glitterball

10:44 am on May 31, 2018 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



To call it a link tax is unfair, this proposal is about taking large snippets of text under the guise of 'fair use'.

If it forces the biggest scrapers on the planet out of business, then I'm in favour of it.

Does anyone know if there is anything in there that would end Google's image hotlinking?
I'm now paying more in bandwidth bills because of Google's image hotlinking than I was when my sites got 10x more traffic than they do now.

QuaterPan

7:22 pm on May 31, 2018 (gmt 0)



To call it a link tax is unfair, this proposal is about taking large snippets of text under the guise of 'fair use'.

I agreed. But seeing how some sites are over reacting over the GDPR , you can't know the side effect of such law. See how sites started to use nofollow worrying about Google's penalty. So tomorrow, may be web publishers will start worrying about linking simply, who knows. We are living in a very unfriendly online environment now.