Forum Moderators: phranque
But real art, that still remains, even in photography,
But real art, that still remains, even in photography
Mark_A: I know someone who swears by an advertising photographer who can make an impactful image from the most mundane items :)
tangor: however, I believe the rise of the cell phone with decent to often astonishing capability, has changed the landscape of the niche, providing Billy Bob and Bobby Sue with the "technical tools" to produce images better than a Kodak Brownie consistently, frequently, nearly always at "a professional level". (Sitting on a pile of film cameras obtained and used over 55 years, multi-thousands of dollars, a dismantled dark room, properly disposed of odious chemicals, etc)Yeah, I miss those days too, and yes, you are right. I think photography has been compromised :( because any Billy Bob and Bobby sue "can do it" sort of. The next frontier is VIDEO, because it demands more from the one behind the camera and the one doing the editing. I think there is good market share for this.
I miss the old days. Sigh.
When clients visited he would book a studio, lights, and would shoot an expensive camera in front of the customer
That's deception, and perhaps was reflected in high prices. Awful. I'd like to think that is quite rare.
Mark_A +: I remember a story about a product photographer who worked at home with a couple of lights and backgrounds he created. When clients visited he would book a studio, lights, and would shoot an expensive camera in front of the customer - to impress. When the client had gone he returned to shooting at home, the client was none the wiser.So true, I know about these things and I can't say "it works", the right expression is "that's they way it works for some people/clients", the problem consist on the fact that some people (clients), at certain stages can't look at the son, but instead they keep looking to the finger pointing to the sun (it can be a pen, or pencil).
engine: That's (1) deception, and perhaps was (2) reflected in high prices. Awful. I'd like to think that is quite rare.(1) Yes and NO, it depends, it can be the case, but... not so fast cowboy!; (2) again, yes and no, it depends. Some people charge things they don't even use, things they show only to impact the clients, but others charge THE RESULTS.
This kept some people out of the market and competition; but in a positive way, it served as a filter, because only people willing to get trained or train themselves and invest time would really get involved.