Forum Moderators: phranque
tangor: Sadly, most users don't view the web as a tool, but as an entertainment sourceso true.
graeme_p: Take a look at the dependencies people drag in unnecessarily. It gets stuff developed quickly but it is insecure and fragile. Remember the Leftpad incident?I wasn't aware of this incident, and what surprises me the most is how something so simple is requires to "include" rather than just write the code (again, for something so simple), it's another case of extreme drag and drop sort of saying.
graeme_p: People want cheap, and they do not understand goodYes, and many times they contradict themselves. Recently I bought something and the seller, who later by talking became a regular person, was telling me the benefits of some routers and I said "I'm happy with mine", he was blown away when I described my tomato router (custom alternative firmware for routers), using only 12v, and was shocked, then explained to me how much his electricity bill went up after installing some "magic super cool modern" router to distribute Internet to a couple of computers, and it's doing way less of what the tomato router does.
tangor: I suspect "efficiency" these days is measured by "how few hours can it be done via plug/inclusion" compared to doing it the right way.True. Recently joined a local graphic designers group just to see what's going on, I'm shocked by the posts talking about technology and the minimum needed to work on the field, they are quite wrong but doesn't surprise me. Most opinions advice going for insane configurations, tons of RAM and tons of video memory on dedicated graphics, SSDs, expensive setups, etc. I sure know many of the fresh tools require up to date versions of Windows or MacOS that also require lots of ram, but a circle is a circle, a photograph is a photograph. So I pointed out it's insane how most designers are wasting crazy amounts of money jut to produce a final PDF with a picture and text, something that you are able to do since the 90's with 512 megabytes of ram. To make matters worse, the lack of proper technique means they are now creating the same PDF but it weights 250 gigabytes on disk.
The first Mac fit the entire graphical operating system AND a word processing app on a single-sided 400k disk.