Forum Moderators: phranque

Message Too Old, No Replies

SHA-1 Defeated

         

brotherhood of LAN

1:55 pm on Feb 23, 2017 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



[security.googleblog.com...]

For the tech community, our findings emphasize the necessity of sunsetting SHA-1 usage. Google has advocated the deprecation of SHA-1 for many years, particularly when it comes to signing TLS certificates. As early as 2014, the Chrome team announced that they would gradually phase out using SHA-1. We hope our practical attack on SHA-1 will cement that the protocol should no longer be considered secure.

NickMNS

5:46 pm on Feb 23, 2017 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



This is just crazy stuff, and I amnot sure what is more crazy the Math or the Computer Science.
Nine quintillion (9,223,372,036,854,775,808) SHA1 computations in total

Dimitri

10:12 pm on Feb 23, 2017 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 5+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Some will certainly come and argue that this is #*$!, and that Google is pushing people to use other encryption algorithms to make more money...

robzilla

10:35 pm on Feb 23, 2017 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Cryptography is a mind-boggling affair, and I'm glad other people bother with it so I don't have to :-)

graeme_p

6:03 am on Feb 24, 2017 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



@Dimitri - how would Google profit from this?

robzilla

10:52 am on Feb 24, 2017 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



They wouldn't, of course, but I think that's his point.

tangor

12:31 pm on Feb 24, 2017 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



More commentary

'First ever' SHA-1 hash collision calculated. All it took were five clever brains... and 6,610 years of processor time


[theregister.co.uk...]

NickMNS

1:15 pm on Feb 24, 2017 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



However, it is not beyond the reach of a large corporation or intelligence agency to forge a TLS certificate, a Git repo...


Forge a GIT repo! There must be a few nervous tech companies around, wondering whether their code is safe? The door opened by this vulnerability is huge. One could steal the code outright. But far worse you could inject malware into the code without anyone ever knowing, steal customer data, spy on users, a Stuxnet type attack could be carried out without requiring physical contact with the computer (assuming code base for the attack is repoed on GIT).

Dimitri

2:34 pm on Feb 24, 2017 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 5+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



My comment was a joke, as a reference to the discussions held at the HTTPS topic :-)

tangor

4:43 pm on Feb 24, 2017 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



@Dimiri: Jokes are harder to perceive in these desperate daze! (sic)

robzilla

11:42 pm on Feb 24, 2017 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



FYI: WebmasterWorld has an intermediate certificate with a weak SHA-1 signature in its chain.

ergophobe

4:34 am on Feb 25, 2017 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Uh Oh... Of course, for right now, probably not many people outside of Google and government actors can exploit that, but time to get the house in order.

robzilla

8:48 am on Feb 25, 2017 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



True, but browsers are expected to drop SHA-1 soon, so you might lose your padlock.