Forum Moderators: phranque
I view someone as blackhat if they either use automated techniques or take advantage of search engine algorithm loopholes (some of which have been noted above). Those are the two things that distinguish a blackhat from a whitehat by my definition. It's not about legality, or morals, though many disagree.
The idea that a blackhat is somehow 'wrong' I think is due in part to the hacker background, where blackhats did stuff that was illegal. SEO isn't illegal, including doorway pages or white on white text.
As for the idea that blackhat's get 'punished', that's wrong too I think. I suspect there's plenty of blackhats raking in gobs of cash. If you find a loophole or something that works, and get it ranked for 3 months, making $30K a month, then get banned, I'm not so sure that making $90K in 3 months is getting punished. Particularly when the next step is to repeat the previous success on another domain name. Getting banned I suspect isn't a punishment, it's just a viewpoint of making a lot of money from a site in a short period of time, throwing it away and doing it again somewhere else.
If you're a whitehat and pour your heart and soul into your site, then yes, getting banned is punishment. If you expect it and plan for it, it's just an $8 domain name you get made $90K from.
Conversely, white hats will typically work within search engine guidelines. This doesn't make them legal, or even morally correct. It just makes them those folks that for some reason or other have decided that the way for them to get ranked is to do so within search engine guidelines.
Would that be considered blackhat in seo terms? I've got a PR 4 site. I'm not trying to do it for the SEs - more the users.
Also thanks guys for the wider meaning. I think I'm rather ignorant to the tactics you can use online!
if you had them all written in tiny text, or coloured them so they couldn't be seen, or positioned them off the page with css, or... etc etc. that is blackhat.
a good test that everyone tells you is this: ask yourself if the links are there for your users or for the search engines. if they are there purely for the search engines then maybe you should take a second look at them.
doesn't sound like yours are though. so should be fine.