Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

Strategies for launching a new site.

...with no possibility of on-site SEO!

         

AnonyMouse

9:04 am on Feb 22, 2007 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I've been presented with an interesting challenge by a client. The site they are about to launch cannot be touched in any way - there is *zero* possibility of on-page or site-wide SEO, including *zero* possibility of adding unique, link-bait, long-tail, or any other kind of content. (PPC is already in hand)

So...all the SEO has to off-site. What possibilities does that leave us? Here's my thoughts:

Option A: white-hat
- submit site to relevant categories of trusted directories
- research competitors' backlinks, seek to gain same
- look for other linking opportunities, possibly even paid links

Option B: black hat
- generate a load of scraper-type sites on different class C IPs, cross-link them all, and point to new site

Option C: marketing
- build up a seperate, but on-theme, site that is of genuine interest to the target market, using lots of unique content
- in other words, the SEO work work would go into a totally different site with the intention of generating leads from that site.

Option D: all the above!

Interested to hear thoughts on pros/cons of any of the above strategies, or indeed new ones!

Quadrille

5:41 pm on Feb 22, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I'd walk away.

the time for SEO is at the design stage; if they've ignored any SEO input, then they sink or swim - why take the blame?

If you've looked at the site, and it happens to be OK, then lucky old you.

But a client who refuses to take a dvice (before they've even heard it!), is not the ideal client!

Robert Charlton

7:50 pm on Feb 22, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



I'd walk away.

And don't even look back.

AnonyMouse

10:33 am on Feb 23, 2008 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I did indeed walk away!

sonjay

11:55 am on Feb 23, 2008 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I can't help but wonder if they offered any reason for the ridiculous "don't touch" rule. I'm quite curious as to what would motivate a company to impose such a restriction.