Forum Moderators: open
1) does the domain extension (.com/.net/.co.uk....) effect page rank in any way?
2) is gettin backlinks only to my site more valuable than link exchanging?
i hope u all r gettin my point here...i mean one thing is getting links to my site from other site, without giving a link back to that site from my site, and other is the regular link exchanging.
3) does w3c validation effect page rankings?
1. Nope - except in local searches; for example, a .co.uk site will fare better in UK searches (host country makes a difference, too).
2. Getting quality links, eg from a quality directory is generally safer than exchanging links, which nees to be with related sites, and with quality sites only. Careless linking costs lives - site lives, not people's ;)
3. Validation does not directly affect page ranking. But checking your validation, just like checking your site for Google sitemaps or adsense, can throw up errors and problems you never realised you had. So it is worth thinking about. Xenu is probably a better way to find errors that may affect spidering and therefore ranking - it's the best way to check navigation.
1) exchange links with a site about "money making from home"
2) simply get a link back to my site from that site, contacting its webmaster, but not providing a link from my site to his site.
i think its clear now..its: link exchange vs one way link
But linking is what the web is all about, and many people believe that sites with no outbound links should also be penalized, though I've seen no evidence. But be careful where those links go.
As for 'value', in general, a link is a link, regardless of whether you link back or not. I have seen some amazing mathematical calculations 'proving' that linking back reduces the value of the inbound link - but unless you have the SE algorithm in your and you fret over 0.0001%, I'd not lose sleep over that.