Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

Did Google just land a Below The Belt Punch on Microsoft?

         

Brett_Tabke

4:09 pm on Jan 12, 2015 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



[engadget.com...]

...it's Windows users who are feeling the pain after Google publicly posted the details of a Windows 8.1 flaw before Microsoft could fix it. In a public response to the disclosure, Microsoft's security chief Chris Betz says that Google's decision to publish and be damned before his company's scheduled patch was less about "principles" and more about getting one over on its rival.

engine

4:47 pm on Jan 12, 2015 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



It seems Microsoft is calling for a better coordinated system for vulnerability disclosure.

Either way, it's not smart to release details of the vulnerability when there's a known fix coming.

In terms of the software industry at large and each player’s responsibility, we believe in Coordinated Vulnerability Disclosure (CVD). This is a topic that the security technology profession has debated for years. Ultimately, vulnerability collaboration between researchers and vendors is about limiting the field of opportunity so customers and their data are better protected against cyberattacks.better coordinated system for vulnerability disclosure [blogs.technet.com]
We believe those who fully disclose a vulnerability before a fix is broadly available are doing a disservice to millions of people and the systems they depend upon.
Although following through keeps to Google’s announced timeline for disclosure, the decision feels less like principles and more like a “gotcha”, with customers the ones who may suffer as a result. What’s right for Google is not always right for customers. We urge Google to make protection of customers our collective primary goal.

lucy24

9:44 pm on Jan 12, 2015 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Below-the-belt punch on Microsoft ... or on Microsoft's human users?