Forum Moderators: open
"...we will distribute IE7 as a high-priority update via Automatic Updates (AU) shortly after the final version is released for Windows XP, planned for the fourth quarter of this year."
My take: as Windows XP is now the only consumer-level OS supported by Microsoft, the automatic replacement of IE6 by IE7 will mean a massive shift towards IE7 in the weeks and months following the final release. This means two things: a more rapid possible deployment of websites using advanced CSS techniques etc. not possible with IE6, and secondly a rapid, important (majority) market-share for IE7.
we will distribute IE7 as a high-priority update via Automatic Updates
...in order to take market share from FireFox.
I bet they will add/modify a toolbar as well, just to start sending more users to MSN search.
G$$gle, pay attention. This is how you fight real fights. By taking market share from a competitor, NOT BY ABUSING YOUR OWN CUSTOMER BASE.
New or just improved?
Just improved, IMHO. There's a posting on the IE blog about CSS in Beta 2: [blogs.msdn.com...] . And an overview [webmasterworld.com] in the CSS forum.
I haven't tried IE7 since the first public beta. But I'm not aware of any CSS improvements since then.
This may quickly change the domain name/site naming picture for countries with non-Western character sets, such as Japan, Korean, Russia, China etc. with a possible knock-on effect on SEO.
[edited by: Edwin at 10:49 pm (utc) on July 26, 2006]
On top of above, I did not like the navigation set up:
- type-in bar is moved higher away from web pages(I like to see where I am without moving my eyes)
- more waste of space on the screen, more bars, more roll downs, more confusion
- icons in the right corner (I did not find the way to move them from right to left, which I prefer)
- graphics are tiring after while and kind of intrusive
Over all, I did not like it.
On the up side this will decimate IE 6.0's 33.3% market share on my site. :)
- John
[edited by: JAB_Creations at 2:00 am (utc) on July 27, 2006]
Is there something that I should be doing? Does "advanced CSS" go beyond basic markup styling and layout techniques?What exactly are we looking at here, capability-wise? New or just improved?
It renders much the same as Firefox does, png transparancy actually works etc, I use it all the time now although I am using Vista Beta on my dev machine as I knew something like this would happen, I have already stopped designing sites to work in IE5 and now IE6 as well.
css wise, can we expect sites that work in IE6 to break in IE7?
Anyone can confirm/deny if IE7 hangs just like IE6 does?
I've noticed something worrying about the zoom feature on IE7 beta though. It seems to break the layout in some well-constructed sites, where the zoom in Opera, for example, has no problems. Hope they fix this.
...in order to take market share from FireFox.
I suspect most people use firefox for political reasons or because someone told them "it was better". Neither of those change. It might slow the uptake of firefox because to an end consumer there is less benefit in moving, but that's all.
It is exciting that for the first time there will be good CSS & PNG support in maybe 70 - 80% of visitors. Still IE6 will retain a > 10% share so we will still need to hack for some time to come.
I'm not sure how this will take market share from firefox.
Very easy. I am sure they will replace some stuff, like make HTML Mime type to launch IE7 instead of Firefox. There are so many not obvious things that can be done short of making firefox "break" on some systems - hehe we don't suppose that ever happened ;-)