I'd like to see something that helps publishers better understand where invalid click activity is coming from - which web property is the target, which ad block/channel is the culprit. It would certainly help publishers, advertisers, and Google.

As for invalid clicks , I get ride of them when I started blocking all IPs from Datacenters , which, by the same occasion is blocking 99% of scrapers.

I'd like to see a funnel that drops ka-ching directly into my bank account.

Daily. :)

</humor>

More practically, publishers have greater control CONTEXT WISE on the ads that appear. The current tools are insufficient and all too often overridden.

Hi
Sometimes Adsense Policy page throw me with 10 or more pages that may contains sexual content (must fix: No). But when I check all those pages I found no sexual phrase or words. I do a request, and Adsense Policy's response always be negative (No policy violation was found for now).

I would like to see a feature tell us where exactly the content that they think is "sexual content". So we can then remove it or even change it if it a miss leading meaning.

Hello,

Adsense Policy page

I'll share my observations (no proofs, just guests).

I have "one" page, which keeps appearing for "shocking content" , or something like that. The first time it happened, I panicked, worrying that it was the beginning of troubles. I had reviewed the page over and over again, every single details, I also inspected each sentence,for a double meaning. I can't find anything. However, the next day, this page is automatically removed from the list of violations, without actions from my part, I do not ask for a review.

So, I guess there is an automate process to detect violation, but also another one, to check if the violation is "gone".

Second case, last summer, another page was blacklisted. This time, I could figure what was wrong. There was a sentence which could have a double meaning. So I redid the sentence, to avoid confusion or misinterpretation. Then, I did NOT ask for a review, to see if the page would be valid again , automatically, like for the first one. However, this time, after weeks, the page was still listed as violating the Adsense policy. So I did an experimentation. At Google Search, we could still find my page, while searching for this sentence. So, At the GSC, I asked the page to be "temporary" suppressed from the index, and then it was recrawled. Some weeks later, this page was no more showing for the sentence, and at the same time, Adsense removed it from the violation list.

So my theory is that, it's not only a matter of the content of your page, but also, what people reaching it are searching for. I don't know if I explained it right.

Secondly, I wonder if the visual of an ad, can trigger a violation for the page. For example, if an ad is showing a woman in lingerie, I have the impression that it makes Adsense believes the page is about sex. I know it sounds silly, but...

@JorgeV
Hi,
"
So my theory is that, it's not only a matter of the content of your page, but also, what people reaching it are searching for. I don't know if I explained it right.

Secondly, I wonder if the visual of an ad, can trigger a violation for the page. For example, if an ad is showing a woman in lingerie, I have the impression that it makes Adsense believes the page is about sex. I know it sounds silly, but...
"

You make me smile of joy while I'm reading your comment:
Firstly cause that for the first theory I do see some search query that have "sexual meaning" which driving users to my website from google search. but I didn't realize that it could make this problem until now. So Thank you very much.

Secondly because I have the same theory about ad that showing lingerie or something like that, but with another including that I'm using Jubna ads too, and this shows many times some "sexual phrase" like (it mean: t.i.t.s - p.e.n.i.s... enlargment) (I wrote mean cause my website is Arabic language).

So I was thinking that this ads from Jubna when they appear they give a false alarm from google. Now I'm sure this is the problem, cause really I have no "sexual content or double meaning" on most pages. Thanks again for sharing.

By the way, because of that Jubna not caring too much about "sexual content" I do prevent Adsense Ads from those pages and let Jubna serves. Its help when I can't change the content of some pages, it let me have extra Euros.

If ads showing on a page, can rise warnings, those using Taboola, and other Outbrain can have serious problems. Half of their images are sexy clickbait. I do not want to sound prude , but often this is excessively "sexual".

I'd just like to see people clicking on ads in the first place.

^^^ Sometimes the obvious needs to be re-stated. :)

I want Ad-Balance back!

My Primary feature is for Google to Re adjust their invalid click detection systems to make it more friendly to new Websites.

I have noticed that Google Adsense does not tolerate invalid click activities from smaller Websites no matter how little the Invalid Click is. But they have a lot more patience with websites that has more DAU

Backup ads, without any doubt.