Forum Moderators: martinibuster
Is anybody else in this situation?
Let's say ad network told you that you get:
70% of .01-.10 clicks
50% of .11-.25
40% of .25-.50
30% of .51-.99
20% of 1.00 and up.
Now, tell me having that information would be meaningless.
Now, ad network tells you that the percentages change based on traffic. More traffic (average over 60 days, say), better %, and they give you info on caps and fill rates.
Now, tell me again having that information would be meaningless.
I daresay some people might begin doing some analysis, adjust sites and ad placements to mazimize revenue. Or, some might be upset at that 20% over 1.00 and look elsewhere.
Sorry you think of yourself as such a giant business genius, but saying anything is meaningless smacks of ignorance and arogance. The percentages at least offer a perspective for the publisher and a bit of understanding on how the system works and pays.
For sure, but I am talking about when they are the same or very similar not when they are big differences.
I am not going to run some ads just because it is a higher %...
But as I said knowing the % is handy for other things. Like just simply knowing it has been changed, rather than us all on here speculating.
Since this topic is about whether the time to leave AdSense is approaching, I'd contend that each of us needs to decide what our dealbreakers are. Some forum members may feel that Google's "lack of transparency" is reason enough to quit AdSense; others (myself included) are more likely to make such judgments based on eCPM, earnings, and the availability of better-paying alternatives.
Since this topic is about whether the time to leave AdSense is approaching...others (myself included) are more likely to make such judgments based on eCPM, earnings, and the availability of better-paying alternatives.
Exactly. As long as adsense is the best game in town most of us will continue with it. At some point it may not make sense, but for now on my sites it does.
It tells you before you serve them, that is the point.
It tells you what before you serve the ads? Certainly not what you're going to earn.
Anyway, that isn't how AdSense works. The AdSense network has been around since 2003, and Google has always treated its inner workings as proprietary information. Barring a mass exodus by publishers (which isn't going to happen), it's hard to imagine why Google would be willing to reveal its trade secrets.
As for Adsense I personally think they will give publishers a little more control and info, else they will have shelf the stuff they are testing.
As to reasons for leaving well I won't be leaving either unless I make more cash somewhere else. On one site I am removing Adsense to test something else on the other I am not. but I have not felt that need until now and I guess the same is true for some other publishers else we would not have this thread...
For sure, but I am talking about when they are the same or very similar not when they are big differences.
I am not going to run some ads just because it is a higher %...
FattyB, you should just stick with your position as quoted above, which is a reasonable one.
Of course what the rest of us are saying is that different networks CAN have big differences between what they charge, and that's why the percent share is of little if any decision-making value. It's absurd to assume that the advertisers end up paying the same CPM or CPC rate to every ad network.
sutrostyle, it's been two weeks, did you jump? And if so, how's life on the other side?
Before joining adsense I was seeing appalling revenues from where I was.
Adsense was good for me, but the last 3 months despite increased traffic has seen a drop of 40% in revenue.
It's very painful, but for all that I am not seriously considering jumping, as I know of no where to sensibly jump.
Europeforvisitors if you cannot see how that would let you work out that you would make more then I am not going to argue the toss.
FattyB, you misread my post. I'm not asking whether you or I would earn more by knowing Google's compensation formula (though I'm skeptical about that); I'm asking how Google would benefit from releasing that information. What does Google have to gain by making it easy for other CPC networks to cherrypick AdSense publishers with offers of higher percentages than Google is paying?
To summarize in five words: "What's in it for Google?"
Well in the case of the non-targeted...nothing. I agree it would not benefit them at all. I am a publisher so I would benefit.
In the case of site targeted they would have to release some information regards pricing if not %. I think anyway for it to work well for them and to compete with other CPM networks. Again as a publisher the more info I get the better. Especially if I want to do some direct sale deals with advertisers. Knowing what they have been paying the network is very handy.
The more info you have as a publisher the better you can deal with said network, other networks and advertisers direct. The tighter the economy gets the more publishers will feel the pinch and that puts more pressure on networks to release more info or increase share...espcially if they continue to post high profits.
[edited by: FattyB at 8:10 pm (utc) on Jan. 22, 2008]
The tighter the economy gets the more publishers will feel the pinch and that puts more pressure on networks to release more info or increase share...espcially if they continue to post high profits.
You have this exactly BACKWARDS!
...and I suspect you have an inflated idea of the value of any individual publisher.
I'm guessing, at this point, that you don't advertise via adwords?
Well for sure, I am a publisher and don't have any Google shares.
I think what Martinibuster says is very true. There are few alternatives that can match Adsense, even when it is not doing as well as it did for some, and are easy to get into. In fact the ones I know that are easy to get into are all pay many times less than Adsense.
The couple that I think might be better, now, for one of my sites are quite difficult to get into...one only just let us in for a test with 1 million USA uniques being at the bare minimum it seems...
However, something else cropped up this week as a possible alternative with joining a bigger network who have a CPM (I think) deal with Google. Would solve my falling rev issue with Adsense on that site maybe.
But certainly is not easy and we are quite lucky in that we only run Adsense in one spot. If it was the whole site it would have been stuffed a few months ago.
Coach, oh sure I could imagine it could go the other way and publishers would find themselves being forced into running whacky ads etc. Did popup madness not ensue after the previous crash? But I am always optimistic.
[edited by: FattyB at 8:40 pm (utc) on Jan. 22, 2008]
The other company I mentioned are more of a network and want to take over everything on the site regards advertising. Including supplying Adsense.
I am going to give one of them a try for this site for sure. I just need to work out how quickly it can be done and how to do it practically. In terms of payment cycles etc. Always tricky to change any advertiser if you don;t have lots of cash in the bank to provide cash-flow while you switch.
But Adsense continues to do well on the other site.
[edited by: FattyB at 5:05 am (utc) on Jan. 23, 2008]
Since December, the CPM networks have been gaining ground while Adsense has been slipping. As of this week, one of the two CPM networks I use easily outperforms Adsense and the other is not far behind. We give Adsense the best placement on our site, too, with custom code to blend Adsense. We haven't made changes to the ad code for at least six months.
To me, this indicates that Google has gone too far in appeasing their advertisers and has not done enough to support their publishers. If this trend continues, we'll likely replace Adsense in the coming months.
I wonder if anyone else has seen this trend?
I tried to figure it out for my account.
Known that day to day revenue was always like a roller coaster, I used monthly revenue as a calculation.
Since actual $ was forbidden, let's use $1 as starting point for my monthly revenue.
2003 Monthly Revenue Average $01.00 (starting from August)
2004 Monthly Revenue Average $01.34 (033.8% increase from 2003)
2005 Monthly Revenue Average $02.17 (062.0% increase from 2004)
2006 Monthly Revenue Average $07.84 (261.6% increase from 2005)
2007 Monthly Revenue Average $11.16 (042.3% increase from 2006)
2008 Let's hope for the best... :)
Note: 2006 big increase due to optimization suggested by Google (as read from their blog/forum) and also from various forum tips.
Yes, among those daily revenue, there was a lot of extreme variations in high and low. The sites also in and out Google sandbox for reasons I didn't know.
Yet... That's the result for my sites.
So.. For me personally, it's still a good investment to maintain the relationship with Adsense.
Our market is extremely high volume and low quality social networking traffic. In that market we were one of the last of the high volume sites to switch away from adsense, so in at least one market the time to leave adsense has already past.
While it is quite disappointing and we sure miss when our traffic was worth well over 5x as much as it is now, if you are going to make a go of it longterm as an independent online entrepreneur you had better get accustom to change. We had a great run with adsense for a long time, now it's time for the next chapter.