Forum Moderators: martinibuster
mydomain.com (without the www.)
a list of several IP
and images.google.something
Result: I allowed all sites again, to avoid loosing money.
Did you check that feature?
google reported a list of sites were ads were not showing, including sites likemydomain.com (without the www.)
[edited by: Juan_G at 6:40 pm (utc) on Oct. 15, 2007]
I'm waiting until I stop reading these "bug" reports before implementing the feature for my account.
FarmBoy
Fredw wrote:I thought everyone had their "mydomain.com" 301 redirected to "www.mydomain.com" (or vice versa). Isn't this really important for Google ratings and/or to prevent both from being seen as duplicate content?
It appears that if we write "www.example.com" in the Allowed Sites list, only URLs with "www." in that domain will generate AdSense earnings. On the other hand, if we write just "example.com", without the "www.", both www. and non-www. addresses will work correctly for AdSense.
From the "Allowed Sites" page in the AdSense accounts:
Example URLsexample.com
allows all pages across all subdomainssports.example.com
allows only pages across the 'sports' subdomain
When I read that the first day, I immediately thought "some people is going to lose money just by writing the usual www.example.com here instead of example.com". It was pretty much clear.
By the way, in my Allowed Sites list, I have only my domains, without "www.", and without the various IPs and domains that appear on the Unauthorized Sites list, and there hasn't been any perceptible decrease in earnings at all.
Naturally, all those IPs and domains (search engine caches, machine translations, image search, etc.) are a very small percentage of traffic (zero point something percent), at least in my case.
There really isn't any way of checking how many hits are on the links, - so a link might have 1 hit, or a click bomb of 100,000, you just don't know.
And with the IP addreses you have no idea whats behind them and why your site is listed there.
The tool still has some holes.
The tool still has some holes
From what I have read on this thread so far, it seems to me that Google should automatically allow all their own proxy / translations sites among "allowed sites".
Having to identify them yourself and then allow them manually is absurd.
If I am understanding matters correctly.