Forum Moderators: martinibuster
A change in code is what did my earnings in, flat simple and has nothing to do with Google liking my site or hating it, the quality of my content or traffic going up or down, not even smartpricing, Google simply forgot what my site is about and is suddenly serving ads not related.
I've had targeting problems from time to time, but they've invariably been sorted out after a day or two. (In the past few days, I even saw some PSAs on my site--something that hardly ever happens, at least in my geotargeting region.)
But......
Is it really Googles fault?
Or is it the fault of advertizers?
I think it's quite likely the latter in most cases. Advertizers that deliberately or otherwise include keywords that are very broad in their campaigns and/or use broad matching when a narrower match might work better and/or don't use negative words as well as they could seem like the more likely culprits to me.
Googles role in poor targeting might be more limited to approving ads that need to be better tuned to the apparent target.
Our rep assured us we are not seeing smartpricing effects. Our ads are the same companies that have been advertising on our sites for 3.5 years.
CTR the same, traffic up, revenue down.
So either magically bid prices went down by the same percentage across several pr7 highly sought after sector sites due to deflation of ad inventory on tens of millions of different adverts a month that we serve or... we are buying jet fuel for someones corporate 747.
For example, suppose many students at a college are clicking on ads, but Google sees that those clicks are all coming from the school's single IP address....?
Or maybe they're just giving away more clicks to head-off an "our clicks are fraudulent" rebellion by advertisers?
We have certainly seen a huge drop in eCPM since before Xmas last year...
And the new 300x250 ATF "Custom Placement Pack" has been a loss for us as well...
I'm not changing a thing for a few more days. Just the usual page updating, adding pages, etc. Getting tired of <.03 clicks, I suggest G raise the minimum bid to at least .10. Seems reasonable enough, as I don't see the point of passing a user along for .02 or .03 or even a nickel, even if that user doesn't result in a sale. It's just ridiculously low in comparison to the price of just about everything else. At least in the US and most other developed nations.
Is Google a part of the globalisation effort to drag median incomes down to "level the playing field?"
That's what's happening. Somebody has already mentioned to me that my income from AS would be good money, in say, Peru. Nothing against Peru, per se, but their standard of living is much less expensive than here in the good old USA. Up the BIDS!
[added:]
Just wanted to add that this latest blip as of Friday coincides with AdWords ability to pause keywords. Could this have an effect on eCPM? You betcha. I'd say once the advertisers get tired of fiddling with this new feature (about 2 weeks) things will improve.
netmeg is the first to post an improvement since Friday (Feb. 16)
My eCPM on Saturday was up considerably over most of the previous week; yesterday and today are within a few cents of this month's average. Tomorrow may be good, bad, or in between.
Day-to-day (or even week-to-week) changes aren't very significant, in my opinion. It's best to think of AdSense as being like the stock market, where the ups and downs average out over time.
or not....
The ups and downs will average out over time; that doesn't necessarily mean you'll be happy with the average. :-)
Same ads which gave 0.10 cents per click a week ago now give only 0.01 cent per click. Why?
I'll bet G's profits won't suffer this quarter.
It could be the reason. Google is trying to reach expected profits for 1Q/2007 and that could be the reason why they cut publishers share of profit. At the same time I wouldnt be surprised if they would double the profits for 1Q/2007.
This is supposed to be a top-shelf program, yet the results since last Friday have been less than what I'd expect from run of the mill banner campaigns.
If Google doesn't want our sites to host their ads and make them their mega-bucks, then it's time to look elsewhere. Whatever they're doing, I'm not happy about it. Earnings are off 40-50% and getting worse.
Fix whatever you morons broke!
but I haveto agree with the look somewhere else...i get about 2% views to clicks...and i dont think i want to give 1000 "name recognition" views to any advertiser for a couple of pennys...
February has indeed been a weird month here... I get 4-5 bad days in a row.. then a very good day... then it starts again with 4-5 bad days. There is some tinkering going on, or some weird moves from advertisers.
ditto.
there is A LOT of tinkering going on ALL THE TIME.
there are always WEIRD moves from WEIRD advertisers!
sigh...
what makes it particular this time is the decrease of revenue while actually experiencing an increase of traffic.
You can't expect an infinite number of high-paying ads, so with more traffic, it's likely that you're going to see more lower-paying ads as you use up your daily supply of clicks from Widgetco or Whatsit Corporation.
My adsense eCPM was gradually falling during 2006. At the same time I was gradually introducing other income sources. Today adsense is about 25% percent of my total earnings with the lowest eCPM of all other options. I am not sure why I keep it at all. Just to diversify and keep an eye on the direction adsense is heading ...
I am convinced that only a combination of adsense/CMP/adbrite/kontera/aff link is going to work in future.
I am convinced that only a combination of adsense/CMP/adbrite/kontera/aff link is going to work in future.
A combination of AdSense ads, CPM display ads, and relevent affiliate links can work quite well for some topics.