Forum Moderators: martinibuster
IMHO, to implicitly write off all Indian traffic as "click fraud" is as silly and rude and nasty as the old "all men are potential rapists" line.
Yes, it *could* be true for a small fraction of the category, but tarring the rest with the same brush is outrageous, and actually my traffic from India converts well, indeed well enough that I hope to put up a local mirror in Mumbai within the next couple of months.
Unless you do something likely to stir up trouble in India with your site then there is no reason to treat it specially.
YMMV of course.
Rgds
Damon
[edited by: DamonHD at 1:33 pm (utc) on Oct. 3, 2006]
When an article underline specific areas that potential click fruad develops then yes I will be concern.
I have nothing against traffic from India yet I'm the main man (G)who pays me may.
Thanks
One industry online may experience only 1% fake clicks while another might be experiencing click fraud upto 28-30%.
Furthermore, different countries contribute different amount of traffic on a given keyword (checkout Google Trends for the same).
It really depends upon the sample data that Business week analyzed. Not even Google has been able to correctly analyze the numbers of click fraud and have not been able to solve the problem as yet... then how come business week was able to determine that India is contributing to click fraud only?
If you are getting fraudlent clicks from India, then maybe you are getting maximum genuine traffic from India too. India is a growing economy and the number of Online users of India has trippled since last year. Blocking Indian traffic is just foolishness on the basis of 2-3 pages report that an X magazine has published.
Do proper research first, know your domain, checkout which country is contributing traffic to your keywords, analyze your traffic, chechout which country people are actually buying and then blame a country for click fraud.
Thanks
Ricky
[edited by: Ricky_G at 3:34 pm (utc) on Oct. 4, 2006]