Forum Moderators: martinibuster
My websites are very image intense, and i beleive that image ads will integrate better that text ads. Additionally i think people are more willing to check out image ads then text ads.
The downside is that due to the less number image ads, its more likely that an service ad will be displayed or an non related image ad.
What are peoples experience with this?
Or leave it to the algo to figure out what works best, once in a while it surprises me ;-)
Ive got 26 domains, and enable only images on one of them. So far in 60% of the cases it shows a service ad (katrina/earthquake ad) and the rest of the cases it shows completely unrelevant ads (as expected).
But it looks much better and much more blended in.
Two questions:
1) Do you get paid for service ads?
2) Doesnt googlemedia bot instantly figure out what ad to display according to the content (instantly as in 2 requests for the same page) or does it take several hours? Reason im asking is if should wait and see if starts serving better ads.
2)The bot can take some time to revisit a site. On the other hand, if you haven't changed the content of the page, then those ads may be the best available.
In any case, Google isn't yet a major player in the world of display ads (a.k.a. "image ads"), so--if those are the kinds of ads you want--you'd probably be better off with a traditional banner network like FastClick, Burst! Media, or Tribal Fusion.