You’ve done the right basics; aged domain, relevant content, clean redesign. But age alone isn’t a ranking rocket anymore. If it’s not showing up after 6–12 months, Google likely reset its trust (especially after the 2023 idle/holding page). DA 27 is helpful but not decisive.

Next Steps:

•Check crawl/index status in GSC: Are your pages being indexed at all?

•Run a backlink audit: Disavow spammy legacy links if needed.

•Get new authority signals: Outreach, PR, social mentions—Google needs freshness & trust.

•Internal link structure: Ensure clear topical clusters & nav.

•Behavior signals: Promote enough to get actual traffic and clicks—NavBoost-type metrics matter now.

That “easy win” dream is fading; Google doesn’t reward dormancy. Treat it like a new site with legacy potential, not a magic bullet.

@wheel - it might be worth reflecting on the DOJ "ranking stack" revelation as well : [webmasterworld.com...]

It is always advisable to buy domains already indexed with own site to avoid nasty surprises. The backlinks all appear on search console? If the domain is good, you will notice the results immediately,If you have difficulty in positioning there is something wrong. Some time ago I bought a expired domain of a site with few backlinks but with some very important ones, a brand, unfortunately, however, there was no way to index the posts on Google and yet it had no manual penalty. He had received a 301, however, before I bought it to the new site of the former owner whose name he had changed

With all the changes listed (change of hosts/country, etc.) and an interim of "holding page" there's no doubt that g sees this as a "new" domain---starting from scratch---and if it is not historically similar in content (they have a long memory!) will be "ranked" more critically. Meanwhile, keywords still have value, just not the SAME value ca 1997-2008. That magic is a bit more tempered and other factors are taken into consideration these days.

It has to be noted that "great new content" from our side of things might not be so great on g's inspection. Just needs to be stated.

OTOH, new sites (which this is) don't seem to get the same early love of the 2012-2019 era---that sandbox kind of thing we all used to chase. Things continue to change and those recent changes ratchet back the bait and hook of the old days to serving ads for pennies while promoting g's content and AI.

Real question is not if g is giving any index love, it is if you are getting any HUMAN love at all regardless of which SE is sending traffic. The other aspect is what purpose is desired. Is the value "ad revenue" or is it "users/knowledge/community". While, both can be true it USUALLY is not. g long ago learned the difference. "Simultaneous" or "Contemporaneous Creation" is a known long standing attribute of human innovation. g (and the other SEs as well) know this from FREQUENT and CONSTANT encounters site after site. In that regard the larger, older, more authoritative sites will rise to the top and all the "newbies" will rank accordingly. It short, it is hard to be heard through the sandstorm of new sites (which the OP's is) which continue to grow.

BUT, as always!, give it time. Continue to grow the site if it is something one believes in! Sometimes a site is a labor of love. Only the webmaster can make that determination. But if the expectation is ad revenue, just know the house has changed the rules and the income lottery is no longer weighted to bringing in new marks:

We Control The Horizontal And The Vertical

^{---(apologies to Rod Serling's Twilight Zone).}

I went through that exact thing with SearchEngineWorld. I'd had it offline for better part of a decade before restarting it a year ago. It took NINE freakin months for Google to decide I wasn't the cause of global warming and let me back into the index. Slowly they have started surfacing content over there and getting a good batch of referrals now.

tracking kw's is a whole different story though. can't find squat.

Brand is more important than ever before.