Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi
I can see why someone would throw in the towel and no-follow everything. That way, your outbound links can never be considered bad.
A Web graph made of nofollow links.
The system determines a count of independent links for the group (step 302). A link for a group of resources is an incoming link to a resource in the group, i.e., a link having a resource in the group as its target. Links for the group can include express links, implied links, or both. An express link, e.g., a hyperlink, is a link that is included in a source resource that a user can follow to navigate to a target resource. An implied link is a reference to a target resource, e.g., a citation to the target resource, which is included in a source resource but is not an express link to the target resource. Thus, a resource in the group can be the target of an implied link without a user being able to navigate to the resource by following the implied link.
[patft.uspto.gov...]
They don't count.
Imagine that every site ends up nofollowing every outbound link (it's already happening, at a small scale); the resulting Web will be made of nodes (pages) that are only linked to each other via nofollow links. Then, unless Google changes something in its algorithm, their link graph would end up either disconnected or (like the kid who underlines an entire paragraph instead of a few important concepts) lead to such an impoverishment of Google's SERPs that nofollow will become the new dofollow and Google will start taking action against the use of it.
But it [nofollow tag] was never intended to be the default for outbound editorial links, and using it for that purpose sends the message that "All of the links from our site are paid links or links to sites that we don't trust."