Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi
its not the trademarked ghost dataset that went missing, and it wasn't a rebuild like the halloween update.
No, but the overall technique has a familiar feel to it. More than one dataset may be involved this time - and perhaps many more. Interesting that three weeks ago we were hearing reports of googlebot spidering like crazy, and in recent days, reports of googlebot not even showing up for some sites.
[edited by: tedster at 5:09 am (utc) on July 15, 2009]
Googles pulling the date from a old review on the page. Yet there are several newer reviews which have been posted. we get crawled pretty much every day. The date its showing is from back in April. I don't know whether this could be affecting us because of stale content. the latest Google cache from the 20th July shows the new content but in the results its showing the old date.
Very Strange, any one else hit this problem. Might be just coincidence but since we've seen the wrong date we have been hit pretty hard.
While I don't like the fact that my site(s) are not in that group, I have to admit that 7 of 10 probably deserve to be there. That does not include the 1994 .txt file that tends to crop up when G is playing around with the algo (which currently sits at #6 :()
I have sites that were at 3 and 6 that have dropped to 16 and 18.
Our site was down for maintenance yesterday morning for about an hour, which might be why the HP isn't showing up, but not sure what to make of the backlinks, except that Google seemed to have a DNS issue (on its end) accessing the sitemap. But that has cleared up in the last few hours.
Time will tell, traffic and googlebot crawls still pretty normal. Perhaps a hiccup, but would like to see my TBPR come back from the 0 it's at now :).
I have the -50 penalty but only on some pages, and not for all terms for example if my page title was "Widget: Makers, Places, and Spaces" and I used to be on page one for Widget, I will now be on page 5 or worse.
But am still on page one or two for Widget Makers, Widget Places, and Widget Spaces.
No paid links, and I don't think that I over link within my own site.
And something is definitely different today for this site but I don't know what it is, the penalized pages might be coming back or some other pages have risen a little.
I would hold tight before making too many changes. I am seeing another wave of very strange changes tonight one of which shows two article directory articles ranking top 5 for very competitive terms that are generally accommodated by what I would judge to be well deserving of those positions.
We're taking a tumble for generic [location][widget], seeing big brands (travel), mom/pop sites, and some spam at the top.
On the other hand, there seem to be either no changes or better placement for phrases that include [location][widget/s] + [specific attribute]
Pages from that domain show up as #2 and #3 However: he still takes the #1 spot, with the homepage of a former [widget] customer. The page displays duplicate content of the [location]-[widgets] homepage he normally ranks for.
Have only seen something like this during the Halloween update.
(edit/add)
Besides losing the [location]+[widgets] term, he also dropped (some terms gone completely, others -30 to -40) for comparable phrases, e.g. [alt location spelling]+[widgets/widgetry]
[edited by: tedster at 8:27 pm (utc) on July 28, 2009]