Forum Moderators: goodroi
"Google is losing as much as $1.65 million a day on the Web's most popular video site""The average visitor to YouTube costs Google between one and two dollars"
Youtube costing Goog dear [sev.prnewswire.com]
Ouch! I never understood this acquisition. Google didn't have any experience with video sites. YT itself didn't have a successful business model before Google bought it (that Google could continue). And Google didn't even run tests on a video site before they bought it... to be convinced they could make money off it.
You can't buy something as big as YouTube with its extreme daily costs unless you have a solid plan from Day 1 to make good revenue. A billion dollars on a pipe dream is bizarre.
Twitter is the new YouTube, as far as I'm concerned. It's a highly popular website which doesn't even have a proven revenue track record. Nobody knows when or even if it can make great money. Yet Google is talking about buying it!?
Google should probably sell YouTube, but who would buy it?
p/g
What I can't stomach about youtube are all the 12 year olds trying to make themselves into a personality (when they don't have one yet). Google is doing us all a favor by keeping them glued to Youtube, image webmasterworld with the same comments....
Sort of like the way McDs gives toys to kids so all the kids grow up to like McDs?
No real point but food for thought.
they should build an adwords-like interface strictly for video ads; and allow people to submit a transcript that could be used to associate the video ads with keyword queries.