Forum Moderators: not2easy

Message Too Old, No Replies

AI art can't be copyrighted in USA

         

tangor

11:26 pm on Feb 23, 2022 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



AI algorithms cannot copyright the digital artwork they generate, the US Copyright Office has insisted.

Officials this month turned down a request brought by Stephen Thaler, founder of Imagination Engines, to register a copyright claim for a digital image he said was produced by machine-learning software. Thaler said the piece, titled A Recent Entrance to Paradise, was crafted by Creativity Machine, an automated system he invented and owned, and argued the software should be recognized as the author of the image.


[theregister.com...]

The Humans Win This Round!

(wink wink, nudge nudge...)

LifeinAsia

4:15 pm on Feb 24, 2022 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Sounds like a convoy of AI trucks may be descending on the U.S. Copyright Office soon...

tangor

9:19 am on Feb 26, 2022 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Hope they are not auto pilot Teslas ...

Kendo

6:34 pm on Feb 27, 2022 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Ah, but wouldn't the person/entity who commissioned the artwork be eligible for Copyright?

For example, if I hire an artist to create a corporate logo or textile pattern for me, then I own the right to Copyright, right?

Just like if I hire a software programmer to create an app for me, I then own that Copyright also.

So it doesn't matter who created it. It's just that a machine cannot own anything, right? Although my computer may have a different idea as to who is master and who is slave :-)