Forum Moderators: not2easy
Yes it is violating copyright, and seems like a futile thing to do. Why copy and get no benefit, when you can make it better?
Why not get a business directory free and get paid every time someone clicks through to the listing. I have that on a site I run and it took me about an hour to get it up and running. Add your original content to it and you will make some money. If it is just a copy, you probably won't.
What I would recommend is using that other directory to do research for your own directory, instead of just copying things.
Use the other directory to find the sites of the businesses. Copy the contact information from the "Contact Us" page on the site.
It's more work, but it is also more accurate and less fraught with copyright implications.
I would be careful in copying someone else's data unless you do your own due diligence in verifying the information there.
Risks aside, you are effectively promoting businesses for free when they (probably) paid the other site for the listing. Doesn't really make business sense. Of course if you are just looking for the content to monetise via adsense or affiliate advertising then ask yourself, does the web really need another Spamsense directory?
In terms of SEO, just contact details won't really be sufficient content to rank for any significant search terms and if you copy any additional content it will just be duplicated and won't get you anywhere fast.
However, if you are planning a niche directory as part of another site, then there probably won't be many issues with manually adding some listings yourself, regardless of the source. Its more likely that automating the process or copying on a large scale that will get you in trouble - a few listings here and there won't really bother anyone.
When I setup a directory of my own (years and years ago), I went through some Yahoo categories and lifted the URLs. Not a big deal because I wrote my own descriptions and hand selected the entries. But had I scraped the lot and published them like for like then there would be an issue.
MG
No, im not going to copy all their contents but may take 60-70% from them. I will verify all the infos to make sure ill not step into booby traps. :lol:
thanks!
I believe there was a case a few years ago about Yellow Pages vs Superpages, but I can't recall.
[law.cornell.edu...]
I was under the impression that no one could claim copyright on data...
As has been pointed out, and as is explored in some depth in jtara's link, it's not the facts that can be copyrighted, it's the presentation of them - the way they are compiled. The theory goes that if this is done in a sufficiently unique way then it is subject to copyright protection. Of course, and in practise, others may feel that one's own unique presentation of facts is not unique enough!
Be careful, it's murky out there...
Syzygy