Forum Moderators: not2easy
Is it the job of ISP's to censor websites on the web? Is the ISP responsible of the actions performed by the users, in this case downloading mp3's? Another issue is that it is not even certain that the site is illegal according to russian law...
Story here:
[slyck.com...]
The telecommunications industry in Denmark has expressed outrage and concern over the verdict, as they feel it implies ISPs are now responsible for the activities of their users – not to mention a legal gray area where no verdict has been made against AllofMP3.
"The defendant is forbidden to participate in others' access and [copying] via the website www.allofmp3.com of sound recordings, of which the plaintiff [IFPI members, danish record labels] have the copyright.
Furthermore, the defendant shall take the necessary steps to prevent access for its clients t the website, allofmp3.com and all of its pages and subdomains."
The full verdict in danish is here (21 pages PDF):
[dr.dk...]
[news.com.com...]
[usatoday.com...]
Does anyone care that their internet service provider can be forced by the law to shut down their access to specific sites now?
Imagine Globix or Verizon being ordered by a court to shut down access to a poker site, for instance, just like that - without the poker site having been tried and found guilty? I can understand a site being illegal, and user behavior being legal - but I don't see the reason in going after the ISP, at least as long as the website hasn't been found guilty in some crime. That is censorship.
Next, I guess, SEs will be forced to remove links to this site.